The education of
the mystical sense begins in self-simplification. The feeling, willing, seeing
self is to move from the various and the analytic to the simple and synthetic:
a sentence which may cause hard breathing and mopping of the brows on the part
of the practical [person]. – Evelyn Underhill
I would have liked to know Evelyn Underhill. Reading her
book, Practical Mysticism: A Little Book
for Normal People, reveals a wry sense of humor as she communicates deep
wisdom. The quote above is a good example.
We are a culture averse to self-simplification. Underhill
wrote in the time prior to World War I, and recognized in that era that Western
culture was not interested in self-simplification. A century later, that is
still true. We analyze everything to the nth degree. The President makes a 20
minute address to the nation and the analysts spend hours dissecting it.
We complicate our lives by both our activities and our possessions.
Recently, I accompanied my husband to a business dinner where people around the
table were comparing notes on the number of e-mail messages each received in a
day’s time. At another gathering, I heard a tablemate describing a kitchen
appliance that sounded like some sort of specialized blender. She had not been
able to use it because the instructions were so complicated. Whenever I hear
advertisements for satellite TV or radio services, I wonder why we really need
200+ options for listening to or viewing media.
What a radical notion—to choose simple in a culture of
complex, to observe the synthesis, the interrelatedness of life instead of
segregating ideas, music and appliances into singular categories or uses. Imagine
how it might be to savor a song, reflecting on its lyrics, enjoying the
harmonies or the interplay of instruments, rather than switching from station
to station. What if you had a favorite skillet that you used regularly to
create many dishes rather than having multiple, single-use appliances that
clutter your kitchen and are used infrequently?
To choose simple as a way to connect more fully to God
may mean less activity and more solitude, less reading and more silence, fewer
words when praying and more listening. This is not a call for undisciplined haphazardness—reading
the Bible when I remember to do so or serving others only when it doesn’t
conflict with something I’d rather do—but instead is about a disciplined attentiveness
to deepening relationship with God through regular silence and solitude and by
engaging in activity for the sake of God’s kingdom that may not garner any
attention or accolades from others.
Underhill’s observation that self-simplification is the
way to open ourselves to greater connection to God certainly would lessen the
inventory of many bookstores, reduce the number of Christian conferences and
render inconsequential many of the seemingly burning issues that divide
Christians, which is why it will not likely be a widespread movement. But I
believe she is onto something in her call for self-simplification, however dull
and unstimulating it may appear against our ego-oriented culture of more,
bigger and busier. Jesus, after all, compares the Kingdom of God to yeast that
works its way unseen through a batch of dough, and says we will find his
presence in simple everyday sustenance of bread and wine. Radically simple.
No comments:
Post a Comment